" I think Bill joined because he saw some enormous posibillities (sic)/probabilities, but totally misjudged the timeline, as we all have. I think he believes, as we all have in the past, that the possibilities still exist. Othewise (sic), if I were in his shoes, I would have already picked up my resume and track record, and moved on."
Solms has been given a bonus for lying. Why would he want to move on? His predecessor was given bonuses for lying. The BoD backs this strategy and continues to collect their paychecks for supporting the lying. Of course, the claim has been made that it is okay for a ceo to lie to shareholders.
Isn't it interesting that the optimistic approach has said it is okay to lie, the CEOs have said it is okay to lie and the BoD has said it is okay to lie? The market is security and Trusted Computing. The prospects and customers have said it is NOT okay to lie. The prospects don't trust the company to deliver and customers have said the company has not delivered. They lied and the numbers show it. But when you want to see the optimistic view only, you get caught up in a web and things get weby.
Being "wrong" has been extremely profitable.
