InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 109
Posts 8823
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/03/2004

Re: None

Friday, 06/16/2006 9:30:33 AM

Friday, June 16, 2006 9:30:33 AM

Post# of 358439
CMKX Lawsuit Number 5 ~~ Update 06/16/2006

Motion by Plaintiff to Exempt Arbitration:

http://convert.neevia.com/prods/c1053949-5453-49de-aedc-07add30442a7.cvn/08.pdf

And the motion was granted:

http://i6.tinypic.com/14l2cqo.jpg

Looks like there is no arbitration and this lawsuit is going directly to trial!



////////////////////////////////////////////////////



What freaking right does Urban Casavant have in giving away free trading shares of CMKX to pay for the expenses of CMKXTREME?

http://i5.tinypic.com/14l2d0l.jpg

http://i6.tinypic.com/14l2fsl.gif

The above lawsuit is about the 2005 contract.
Rutherford is suing for damages on the 2005 contract.

What about the 2004 contract?


Unbelievable, the mentality of Urban Casavant, to actually believe he can get away with this!





Of course _ all is IMO

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.