The opposition is to the Answer and counterclaims as not being filed correctly. There is NO motion nor even an inkling of such to request withdrawal (dismissal w/o prejudice) of Magna's claim.
Who are these "Magna IRP lawyers" you write of?
Are you claiming I am an IRP for Magna or compensated in any way by Magna?
Sorry to disappoint, butt I am nott an IRP nor do I have any link to Magna nor any party in this lawsuit.
Butt the claim that Magna has filed an opposition for the purpose of dismissing their own complaint is simply FALSE and unsupportable.
It would also be stupid, as the counterclaims could simply be filed as a new lawsuit (which is one of the points of the opposition, BTW, as regarding third parties).
It would also be stupid because it may allow Granville to take the matter ~OUTT of NY state courts and into a Federal District court in Florida pleading diversity jurisdiction. Magna would be giving up the home forum advantage that they currently have in NY state courts (which will cost Richie lots more munny to be represented in NY courts by hos Florida solo (+2 very junior associates) lawyer.
The stupid ones here are Richie Granville and his solo (with two very junior associates) practice lawyer who is screwing up right ~OUTT of the gate.
I expect Granville will pay for a rebuttal brief to the opposition. If the rebuttal brief is even marginally competent (we'll see if the solo is up to the job with a second try), I'd expect the court to grant leave for Granville to pay for Granville's solo to draft a proper Answer and counterclaims and then file it within the time limit that the court may designate for such.
Richie will pay, pay, pay and we're nott even in to the pretrial motions period and discovery yett.
Magna will spend Richie onto foodstamps long before any trial date is near. Since Magna contested even the Answer, you can bett there will be pretrial motions upp the wazoo as then spend Little Richard Granville into bankruptcy court.
And the YIPI "financials" better disclose whether YIPI shareholders are paying for Richard Granville's personal legal bills. If they are, I would consider that at a minimum a breach of fiduciary responsibility and perhaps embezzlement of corporate funds to pay personal expenses. It is an arguable point, butt if YIPI is paying and it's nott disclosed. Oh my! Badd times for Richie ahead.
Neow, who are these "Magna IRP lawyers" you write of?
AI
