InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,346.56
(
-1.84%
)
US TECH 100
17,900.00
(
-2.65%
)
Dow Jones
39,737.26
(
-1.51%
)
Brent Oil
77.36
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,585.72
(
-1.36%
)
Post# of 21105
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

greenmachine2

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 14
Posts 453
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/28/2015

greenmachine2

Re: bignastydude post# 5318

Sunday, 08/02/2015 5:49:39 PM

Sunday, August 02, 2015 5:49:39 PM

Post# of 21105
"There was a post by a member who who stated that they talked to either Slotkin or another director that this move was designed to protect against a take over of the company when the as/os/ and float was much lower.. "

I read that too but reading the last 10-K was a lot about convertible notes.

Roger Slotkin: "We have never been properly funded- ( at ANY time since I have been here )" (dingdongrb post#3769)

Anyway an anti take over for current company value of $496K is not very credible IMO.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up