Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[pphmtoolong]

tradero, what makes "sense" to me is that when each site came on line, they already had at least one patient. That would modify the spreadsheet version somewhat.

What makes sense to me is that the earliest sites opened were probably those expected to be the most productive. So the "every four months" between patients for all sites might skew the data in the wrong direction.

What makes sense to me is that five or six months ago Peregrine couldn't claim the enrollment was 'on track' with the slow initial enrollment schedule of this simulation.

In view of the absence of any quantifiable guidance from Peregrine, I can't put much faith in any of these simulations.

I whole heartedly agree the first look-in hasn't happened.

GLTA, Especially Bavi-arm Sunrise Patients,

Paul