InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 834
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2014

Re: Steppenwolf_Speaks post# 37678

Monday, 07/20/2015 6:12:37 PM

Monday, July 20, 2015 6:12:37 PM

Post# of 702046
They can remedy the matter by not having any material misstatements. That costs $0.00. As I said internal control weakness does not equal material misstatement.

Let's say for sake of argument there are no material misstatements, but there are weakness in internal controls. They would need to incur additional costs to remove verbiage from the audited financial statements. The reduction of the verbiage does not change the fact that there are no material misstatements (as indicated in the hypothetical argument we are following)

This can be achieved by working with the 3rd party independent auditors without requiring a CFO.

You are correct that until there is adequate segregation of duties the verbiage will be there, and I am correct in stating that just because the verbiage is there does not a material misstatement make.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News