InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 884
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/22/2005

Re: kownski post# 27519

Wednesday, 07/15/2015 5:28:16 PM

Wednesday, July 15, 2015 5:28:16 PM

Post# of 37236
You just said a mouthful! They had to be built long before to even entice or have NOC commit to the agreement and partnership made with CRQE ( Cirque Energy Inc.)

Why would anyone think, believe or expect a company the size of NOC would take s chance or for that mater Cirque Energy,
take a chance on a product that has not been tested to their satisfaction meeting certain standards and criteria at that time. If you were a member of management and had to put up your own money to ensure that a deal be made and then increase that amount of your debt and potential loss of life savings in a product and pattern that you were not sure off, what would you do? I would opt out if I was not sure, But, they did the opposite, they continued and so did NOC continue with this DGU project and are waiting for final testing by industry and government agencies. The least I could do if I believed is hold, or increase and wait for the final testing.

Look at what management has done since the partnership with NOC was completed:

Sold a number of their DGUS' to Midland Texas Company.
Sold another unit to a small island off the coast of Florida.
Increased the share count to (900,000 000)
Made management changes because of necessity and Hired a new manager.
What other developments and deals occurred, ????

If the DGUS' were not proven to satisfy management then they would not have made the deal with NOC and sold units as well.

That makes sense to me, and I think it should make sense to all shareholders still holding.

Good fortune to all, and we don;t need luck we will have it by holding this companies' shares. OMO

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.