InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 1374
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2005

Re: shiftyshoes post# 428825

Wednesday, 07/15/2015 2:02:57 PM

Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:02:57 PM

Post# of 734757
shifty, I realize how frustrated escrow holders are, and I know there were assets that belonged to the holding company and are now gone. Right is not might in the world of bk law, it is more about lies and how much your adversary can get away with.

Do you actually think it is easy to go up against jpm and their deep pockets, it's not. They are corrupt to the core in my opinion and have very deep pockets. A lawsuit, if filed correctly, could do a little damage but it would take a very well respected, very influential law firm to have a prayer against jpm. Problem is, jpm does business with almost every big firm in the U.S. and if they are not currently, the firm would sell out us share holders to jpm in a second.

It is so sad but true. One example that is somewhat relevant. For years I have flipped a patent troll company that is going up against the big boys and has made some headway off and on for 12 years, yes twelve years but when everything looks like it could break for the little guy, just recently the infringers have pulled out a case from the early 1900s and have been successful in getting the courts to review the case on appeal hoping to get the lawsuit thrown out. Another delay, of about a year. On top of that, there have been a dozen different challenges to the patent by the big boys being sued trying to force the patent troll out of business or until the patents expire and become much less valuable. There are other details that you would not believe but we are talking several hundred million in damages and that is the tip of the iceberg. it is near impossible for the little guy to easily win, the big guys don't cave. it's sad but true. all imo

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News