InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 7572
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: loophole73 post# 158276

Sunday, 06/11/2006 9:28:35 AM

Sunday, June 11, 2006 9:28:35 AM

Post# of 432752
Loop: I few years ago I posted that MFL seemed to me to stand for Much Future Litigation. Subseqent events with Idcc licensees over the years have born this idea out. At the time I was informed that MFL clauses were a standard feature in patent licenses. I hope this is not so today or in the future. I always wondered about the reasons for HG's being fired. I now believe it was due do his being outmaneuvered by rival attornies. MFL clauses and special conditions(such as "triggers") played no small role in this. He was however representing a much more vulnerable Idcc than is presently the case and this may have had something to due with his agreeing to these weak licenses. I assume that Idcc has learned from HG's mistakes and will not repeat them
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News