InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1359
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/28/2015

Re: None

Wednesday, 07/01/2015 4:54:15 PM

Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:54:15 PM

Post# of 31518
Natetex, please explain

Please explain to me how my point is invalid. So far, the reason I have not agreed with you is because you have not backed up you argument with any sort of logic or given any proof.


I've agreed with you on the inarguable fact that Lisa and the company are creating new shares and selling and diluting stock.

However, you have yet to give me any sort of reason that I cannot profit off of their dishonest scheme. I have multiplied my money by over 5 times so far by what I am doing. That my friend is proof. Proof that it is possible to take advantage of this company's selfish strategy and apply it to my portfolio using a simple set of principles, basic logic, and base human instinct that I learned in highschool.

It goes to show that a company does not have to be profitable, morally just, or by any means stable to make a profit off of it. While it's still important to be informed, the company's inner drama and chaos has little to no worth in comparison when you use those three things I mentioned earlier: the principle that the greatest predictor of the future is the past, basic logic, and an understanding of base human instinct.

I apologize for calling you out, I just feel like a broken record when someone debates with me without proof or logical reasoning.