InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 367
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2015

Re: Dozd post# 19127

Tuesday, 06/30/2015 11:42:25 AM

Tuesday, June 30, 2015 11:42:25 AM

Post# of 46499
Based on the previous runup in 2013 based on far inferior news, we weren't too far off in thinking this would at least get to .30 after the hearing we got. It didn't, so sure, you're right. But there might be influences in the way of inflating the price. No one expected Hudson Bay to push the price down to .07 while we waited, giving us a joke of a starting point. If we had been at .15 when the news came out with no Hudson Bay, maybe the story is different. We didn't expect this would take as long as it did, further allowing the price to be suppressed while we waited.

I don't know much about Vringo, but they seem to be different. Comparing them jdoesn't do it for me personally.

I expected a $1 runup post-markman based on history but that was short-sighted and I wasn't considering the low price, Hudson Bay issue, convertible debt, and low starting part. And I think a settlement (unlikely) would be under $100M. But there's no reason not to hope a successful case opens up boundaries for other cases. Like I have stated before, we all know the downside of any penny stock but there's no harm in speculating on the best and better-case scenarios. If I'm disappointed after this all ends, so be it. Won't regret talking up and dreaming the possibilies. JMHO.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WDDD News