RedHawk Holdings Corp (fka SNDD)

[jhinvestor51]

For the same reasons that most here I'm sure have invested. To name a few:
- The promise of Klug and Crowley - this is a positive sign, nothing definite.
- Rotelli is out, which undeniably a good thing for the company.
- The potential of a consolidating holding company.
- Low float (although not some 46M but 175M)
- No convertible notes or toxic financing as far as I can tell
- Insiders own most of the shares (but this can change if dilution is opted for)

Those are the positives I see. HOWEVER, I read the 10K and statements made in there seemed pretty stark. Whether the positives above nullify what is in the 10K is anyone's guess.

So there you go MNKD. I invested for what I think are positive indications. Again, that doesn't mean I (or anyone else that's invested) should not worry if worrisome things come to light (e.g. 10K statements). That's why I want to make sure we are discussing through any concerns. I appreciate Cash for taking the time and going through the much needed talking points. Your aggressive gesture of "show me why YOU invested then...???" does not make you credible in the least. Change your posture and deal with serious questions from serious investors with respect and constructive teamwork. PLEASE.