InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 26
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2015

Re: None

Friday, 06/05/2015 11:18:17 AM

Friday, June 05, 2015 11:18:17 AM

Post# of 68424
@spooky did u read the TEVA ruling at all? It tells u right there in the ruling and sets a new precedent on which ALL cases will now ruled on. They can't go back and say well Alice says this, Alice was the old precedence until TEVA case. TEVA ruling clearly states that Alice was wrong and that appeal judges must rely on the district courts finding of facts and give difference to experts that provided evidence at that level. Read the ruling!!! Look up the meaning of precedence. Stop posting false info. The case can be googled and read the FULL case for yourself. As TEVA relates to V, THE RULING WAS UNANIMOUS by judge, jury look at the V ruling. The judges at the appeals level NEVER heard all the evidence or any of the experts but came to their own conclusions. Read Chens Dissension. The district court was the fact finding in this case and to ignore that is to make the district courts role unimportant as fact finder.