SFOR lawsuits listed on bottom of 10K, page 23.
SEC Regulation S-K Item 103 (Legal Proceeding)
From SFOR 10k:
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On March 25, 2013 we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (case no: 13-cv-01895 (SRC)(CLW)) vs. WhiteSky, Inc (an existing channel partner). We filed claims that WhiteSky effectuated multiple contract breaches, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of Intellectual Property, and disclosure of confidential information in commencing attempts to replace our “GuardedID® Customized Desktop Product” with a third party's product since November 2012, even though the contractual agreement did not expire until May 2014. In July 2013, we filed an amended complaint based on the Court’s rulings on the motions, which required some minor adjustments and strengthening based on what we learned through early admissible discovery. In early 2014 settlement discussions commenced and the lawsuit was settled on March 9, 2015 with mutually agreed upon terms.
On March 28, 2013 we initiated patent litigation against PhoneFactor, Inc., a subsidiary of Microsoft Inc., Fiserv, Inc., and First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in Wilmington, for Infringement of United States Patent No. 7,870,599 (the ’599 Patent). Currently Fiserv, Inc. is released from this complaint and we have amended this complaint, in April 2014, to include our two additional Out-of-Band patents (Patent Nos.: 8,484,698 & 8,713,701). As of December 31, 2014 the case was in full discovery. As of March 2015, the Markman hearing was held and the deliberations are continuing with various discussions ongoing.
On May 22, 2013 we filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey seeking a declaratory judgment that (1) we do not infringe upon a patent for customer authentication technology owned by Authentify Patent Co., LLC (“Authentify”), and (2) the Authentify patent is invalid under the Patent Act. Our action was filed in response to an April 26, 2013 filing by Authentify of a patent infringement action against us in Federal district court in Seattle, Washington, claiming that we have infringed upon Authentify’s patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,934,858. As of March 2015, the New Jersey complaint has been dropped and the Washington complaint was settled. Per the terms of the settlement, both parties have agreed to execute waivers that guarantee no further legal action against each other relating to this matter.
AI
