InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,539.10
(
0.55%
)
US TECH 100
19,737.60
(
0.49%
)
Dow Jones
39,197.54
(
-0.28%
)
Brent Oil
86.99
(
-0.40%
)
Bitcoin
55,494.42
(
-2.61%
)
Post# of 27672
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

serfdom

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 284
Posts 43844
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 02/22/2005

serfdom

Re: Nettles post# 2959

Friday, 05/26/2006 12:56:51 PM

Friday, May 26, 2006 12:56:51 PM

Post# of 27672
Yes - if a brokerage is going to issue phony shares to its own customers - they should at least make sure they jive with what the company clearly stated in the merger agreement.

They should have added the restricted label to the phony shares

OR

They should not have issued phony shares in the first place.

Like I said - GROSS NEGLIGENCE. This is a serious breach of that customer agreement everyone signed - unless it says "when we give you phony shares - you agree we are not responsible."


Good stocks are obvious. Extensive DD is how you convince yourself to buy a bad one.

>^..^<
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=3961

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up