InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[the trading doctor]

Forgive the simplicity in this post, but i have a few questions.

First is it admissible in this upcoming NOK/msft trial to bring to light the ruling against ZTE back in october? If so then it would be obvious that the 151 ruling would also be admitted as well.

The answer to that question makes this next one go different ways. If it is admissible then as a jury i might consider that the elimination of the 151 patents might make the 244 patent questionable as idcc after all this time does not feel strongly about their position and sheds the 151 suit and maybe the 244 is not as ironclad as they think.

if the jury will know nothing about idcc and the withdrawal of the 151 from the suit then it is less damaging as you can say that idcc wants to go in with their best and does not want the "messiness" (loops words) of the 151 to convolute any of the positives they have with the 244 patent.

If the actual case info from zte is not allowed to be brought up, would the nok/msft lawyers be able to mention the fact that there was another patent involved with this suit but at the last minute idcc decided to remove it from the trial?

thanks in advacne