InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 646
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/21/2014

Re: igotthemojo post# 90694

Thursday, 04/16/2015 11:59:43 AM

Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:59:43 AM

Post# of 278154
Sorry for the late reply, i have not been keeping up with this message board as much as I should. It seems like this board exploded over the last couple days that i have not been following it.

It was pretty obvious to me that Kim had already achieved a transgenic silkworm due to the old UND sponsored press release and the PNAS report. I don't think Kim would blatantly lie just due to the huge potential reprocussions of doing so. Because of this, I had assumed that the not achieving the transgenic silkworm was regarding one that produces pure spider silk. This recent facebook post shows that it was simply a mistake of carrying over old info.

I know that Kim has not been the most diligent with updating the S-1 info, seemingly preferring to copy & paste everything. I know this because I had contacted Ben last year with a similar question over different old info being carried forward in the past and he made sure it was corrected in the next filing.

Also, concerning your Post #90762, I did a side by side comparison between the two S-1 statements and found that the two statements that you are referring to are seperate statements and both were carried over as legacy info.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News