InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 120
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: rmarchma post# 33298

Thursday, 06/19/2003 4:16:43 PM

Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:16:43 PM

Post# of 433235
And remember, it's "binding arbitration" with Nokia if arbitration happens at all. IMHO, IDCC had this locked up and ERICY was the final piece. I think NOK has little room to wiggle.
Plus, Nokia could have locked in a rate before ERICY but "they" elected to tie the rate to ERICY. Wouldn't you think IDCC has a slew of documents supporting all this. Wouldn't you think after the harsh lessons of MOT that they made sure to include specific language? They had enough years to get it ready!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News