Sunday, March 29, 2015 1:19:56 AM
I'm not sure where you get your logic from. The medical review committee made the recommendation to combine the groups and they are, by the rules of the blinded trial, outside of Peregrines influence for this process. Again, no more than 25% of the control and 1 mg/kg arms were affected so the impact you are implying would require what I believe would be a significant set of low probability occurrences lining up just right to say the 1mg arm was actually worse than the control arm.
Your statement that the MOS of the control arm was better than 1mg arm has no supporting basis and is in fact not supported by the data that is publicly available.
The real impact was having to give up the 1 mg/kg arm altogether and losing any chance of statistical significance using the larger population the combined arms would provide.
Some people keep trying to imply that the censored patients were a ploy used by Peregrine to skew the data. I'm not saying you did this in your post but the subject matter you are discussing seems to always end up with that discussion occurring.
Show me a trial for an end stage disease like 2nd line Non-Squamous NSLC with a 120 people that doesn't have censored patients. The Bavi trial percentage was slightly higher than the few trials that I researched at the time (including Avastins PIII that had hundreds more patients) but nothing that would have caused me undue concern. AND, the more salient point is that the INDEPENDENT medical review committee makes all the decisions on censoring. So unless someone wants to create their own conspiracy theories for the doctor's in the medical review committee and Peregrine conspiring to skew the data by censoring patients then I believe there is no basis to imply the censoring was improper.
Your statement of
As far as my read on the CSM summary judgement filing based on JB's statement, I'd be very surprised if it actually led to a judgement in CSM's favor. I'm not a lawyer and have no legal expertise but I've worked in a extremely regulated industry for my entire adult life. The work I do is subjected to constant adherence to regulatory controls. I deal in findings and reports from regulators and responses to them all the time. The CSM filing doesn't pass the smell test in the slightest. The only basis for JB's defense in the filing was her saying "well I emailed them, what more do you want me to do..." (of course I'm paraphrasing her declarations with my wording).
In the real world involving a significant issue in a regulated industry, the responses to regulatory authorities would have the entire regulatory and contractual structure spelled out as to what was required by law and what was required by contract (I would expect no less in legal proceedings). The response would then provide specific statements that they were adhering to the regulatory and contractual requirements. They would back all this up with QA programs, approved procedures and work performed to those procedures via paperwork that was reviewed and approved by multiple people, not just one worker saying "I emailed them...".
If there was in fact such an issue occurring where there was a breaking of the blinding then I am absolutely confident that regulatory requirements and procedural processes would have required that this be documented in official correspondence between PPHM and CSM and required to be signed by officers of CSM.
The use of an email chain that is extracted out of context from the entire communications chain of events associated with the formation of the trial contracts and the final agreed upon procedures, along with the lack of any other proof of official communications and documented procedure records and no specific quotations from regulatory and contract documents, just plain smells as a weak shot in the dark effort to have the case dismissed. Of course this all just an opinion. The real result will be what the judge says.
Recent CDMO News
- Avid Bioservices to Participate in Craig-Hallum Bioprocessing Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 09/12/2024 08:05:27 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/09/2024 08:43:56 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/09/2024 08:19:30 PM
- Avid Bioservices Reports Financial Results for First Quarter Ended July 31, 2024 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 09/09/2024 08:05:31 PM
- U.S. Futures Rise Amid Inflation Report Anticipation; Oil Prices Climb on Hurricane Threat and Supply Concerns • IH Market News • 09/09/2024 10:09:14 AM
- Avid Bioservices to Report Financial Results for First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2025 After Market Close on September 9, 2024 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 09/03/2024 08:05:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/29/2024 08:30:10 PM
- Form ARS - Annual Report to Security Holders • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/28/2024 08:34:04 PM
- Form DEFA14A - Additional definitive proxy soliciting materials and Rule 14(a)(12) material • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/28/2024 08:32:18 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/28/2024 08:30:28 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/16/2024 11:50:20 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/16/2024 11:48:19 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2024 08:40:04 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/12/2024 08:30:04 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2024 09:02:39 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2024 09:02:27 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2024 09:01:22 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2024 09:01:05 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2024 09:00:54 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2024 09:00:45 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2024 12:23:26 AM
- Avid Bioservices Reports Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2024 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 07/02/2024 08:05:04 PM
- Avid Bioservices to Report Financial Results for Quarter and Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2024, After Market Close on July 2, 2024 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 07/01/2024 11:00:21 AM
- Avid Bioservices Earns Committed Badge from EcoVadis for Sustainability Performance • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/23/2024 12:05:46 PM
- Avid Bioservices to Participate at Upcoming Investor Conferences • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/07/2024 08:05:11 PM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM
Element79 Gold Corp Announces 2024 Clover Work Plans & Nevada Portfolio Updates • ELMGF • Sep 10, 2024 11:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Inc. Completes Major Step on Uplist Journey by Closing Strategic All-Stock Acquisition of CarryoutSupplies.com • NGTF • Sep 10, 2024 8:15 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Announces Sale of 100% Interest in Elder Creek, North Mill Creek, and Elephant Projects to 1472886 B.C. Ltd. • ELEM • Sep 9, 2024 9:34 AM