Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[patientsdeservebest]

The mistake PPHM made was assuming the the control, 1mg and 3 mg were labelled A B C. So PPHM started getting data about A B and C and started getting all excited cause B was doing great. When they finally realized that B was not 1 mg/kg but control they panicked. If you recall originally they combined the 1 and 3 mg arms to try and get something they claimed had statistical significance. Now they are combining control and 1 to cover up the fact that the control had a better MOS than 1 mg/kg.

According to the statement CSM would be the ones who decide what is A B and C. This makes a whole lot of sense as that really blinds the study.

Again you have tremendously inexperienced people on PPHM's part running this study. Combine that with PPHM's lack of integrity and you have the toxic mix that left a big mess.