... Sure, Quite a Few Things Actually' ...
And, if you don't mind ~ maybe you' could post for all to see what I have been incorrect about ...
Quickly, off of the top of my head' ... here is a sample of a few of the issues I have posted about' and encouraged open discussion regarding' ...
I brought a discussion forward, regarding the existence of the Bankruptcy Courts Registry Accounts
I brought to the discussions, The Company's display within their own SEC Filings of Capital Loss' availability and Net Operating Loss availability' ... Both' as presented by the company'
I brought to the discussion table, the important distinctions between the "Day Calculations" presented on message boards, not being correct, within the utilization of a "day" calculation back to the Plan's "Implementation Date" ... when the filings clearly referred to the "Confirmation Date"
I have discussed the distinctions between our company, (WMIH) NOT' actually receiving a Company Designated PLR from the IRS (Private Letter Ruling)
The assignments regarding JPMorgan Bank, N.A. (JPMorgans Banking Sub)~ Not only Not' receiving anything' other than the servicing rights for the extensive WMI Loan File' but also Not' being in a legal position to actually obtain ownership' of said Loan File
I have discussed many times, regarding numerous issues as stated within the "The Examiners Report" ~ specifically the many references to the designated and filed "footnote 39" within, said report'
I posted recently regarding, the R-203 distinctions within the 12/31/2014 recently riled by JPMorgan (10-K)
I have posted many times, regarding the legal separations between the parents filed' WMI Bankruptcy and the Bankruptcy Court designated legal limitations and the distinctly separate WMB seizure by the FDIC September 2008'
I have presented, numerous "distinctions" presented within the now reviewed and signed "Purchase & Assumption Agreement" between the FDIC & JPMorgan as it's receiving bank
I have posted numerous references to the FDIC site itself' and its publically stated procedures, involving all seized entities ~ irrelevant of whether they, the FDIC, found a receiving bank or not (obviously in our case, they did)
I have submitted many references to the US Congress Passed ~ 1934 Act ~
I have presented, numerous wording references within many documents, as prepared and presented to the people'
I have presented numerous references to the "Goulding Document" as prepared and the Courts "Plan of Confirmation" Order being almost a direct copy and paste
I brought to the boards, a discussion regarding Filing # 8179 ~ "The Standing Motion" ~ filed on the "eve" of the Court Room Hearing for the tentative approval of Plan 6 by Susman & Godfrey' ~ (July 2011) ~ (obviously Plan 6 failed)
... Do you' want me to continue ? ... I have more'
AZ
AI
