InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 69
Posts 6510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/10/2010

Re: ddls post# 47131

Wednesday, 03/11/2015 10:42:11 AM

Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:42:11 AM

Post# of 330727
We went through the "low power" thing last month. Does the State University of New York ring a bell? Some posts on this board are sounding like a piece of vinyl that will not properly reproduce sound. Therefor I will continue that theme with a repost of my 2/23 post answering the same question.

"By placing the ActiPatch directly onto the injured tissue the microchip can deliver an equivalent dosage of a full size pulsed diathermy device.
The Bioelectromagnetics Research Laboratory, State University of New York has established that ActiPatch Therapy is providing an equivalent and adequate dosage of electromagnetic energy for the treatment of soft tissue. ”ActiPatch Therapy emits a pulsed 1000 Hz signal that is propelled into the body on a 27 MHz frequency wave. These waves introduce an electromagnetic field into the affected tissue and creates a low frequency electrical current in the damaged tissue. Each pulse is 100 µsec in duration at a duty cycle of 10% (turned off for 900 µsec,). The induced electrical current affects the cells which have been traumatized and physically separated by intercellular fluids, precluding the individual cells in the tissue from communicating with one another. Electrotherapy?s induced electrical signal serves as a synchronization signal, allowing cells to reestablish communication and begin working as a tissue again and terminating the inflammatory response. Exposures in the extremely low frequency range (less than 3000 Hz) induced electric field levels of less than 10 microvolts/centimeter, corresponding to induced power levels less than 10-12 W/cm3, are sufficient to produce significant biological effects.
While much smaller energy levels are required to achieve a biological stimulation, the field intensities utilized by ActiPatch devices are still well above the threshold levels established by the NIH Working Group. Based on recent work focusing on establishing thresholds for continuous cell exposure, ActiPatch devices induce electric fields which are at least 10 times the threshold levels required to achieve a biological response.
Key points of evaluation:
? Cumulative absorbed energy at the skin level is equivalent to traditional high power devices.
? Effect of continuous delivery provides greater therapeutic benefit.
? The BioElectronics therapy power level is 6 to 9 orders of magnitude higher than that which is required to show a biological effect.

Two key questions arise:
? Is the reduced power of the ActiPatch compensated by the close proximity to the tissue and the longer treatment durations, and
? Is the device delivering an efficacious therapeutic dose of electromagnetic energy to the tissues?

The answer to both of these questions is “Yes”. While the ActiPatch field intensity is 150 times less than the traditional devices, ActiPatch is used continuously, as compared to the relatively short treatments. An antibiotic analogy would possibly be that of a time released patch: a timed release distributes therapy throughout the day instead of in one or two doses. Total dose to the tissues is similar. In the same manner, therapeutic, efficacious PEMFs are induced in the tissues by the ActiPatch, resulting in increased capillary flow, edema reduction, and the other effects discussed.
The literature on PEMF effects shows that the ActiPatch power level is 6-9 orders of magnitude above the threshold for demonstrated cell and tissue effects in vitro. Required power density levels to achieve field-induced tissue effects are shown in the table below. PEMFs have been shown to influence cell behavior in in-vitro models wound healing, of morphological adaptation (cellular alignment in the induced electric field), and in vitro models of differentiation.
The ActiPatch affixes onto patient for a convenient 24-hour treatment, with an “overnight” suggested minimum treatment time. Therapeutic efficacy requires consideration of the treatment time difference factor. ActiPatch Therapy Device produces a 24 hour absorbed energy of 630 mJ/cc compared to traditional pulsed electromagnetic devices which produce a 15 minute absorbed energy in the range of 110 mJ/cc at the 1.5 watt power setting This suggests that a 6 to 8 hour ActiPatch Therapy treatment is well within the range of efficacy for soft tissue injuries.

http://bielcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Physics-and-Clinical-Evidence-of-BioElectronics-V3.pdf