The difference between me and BK is essentially this:
- He gathers information that is focused on a specific outcome. In this case no escrow payment.
- I gather information that is focused on a whole other outcome, which according to my own DD and that from posters like AZ, LG, Boarddork and many others is very likely to be 100+ billion dollars coming back to the LT in some kind of way.
My motives are the desire to righteousness and the truth (and getting rich! LOL), and I'm very well willing to fight for that if the FDIC is gonna lowball us. And the truth I see in documents that are NOT blacked out (the GSA, the P&A, the 10k from JPM and many other filings) tell me there is much much more, than meets the eye and people WANT you to believe. And that such can be achieved in a whole lotta different ways.
My point is: If you don't see the outcome of escrows getting paid royally, I respect that. I will and cannot convince you. The only thing that can convince you is the cheque in your mail or the dollars on your broker account (if you own escrows that is).
This phenomenon of seeing or not seeing things is called RAS, or Reticular Activating System. Look it up sometime. It means that your attention is drawn to what you value. If you value 0 for escrows, you obviously don't own them. Simple right?
But don't accuse me of misreading, misunderstanding or something else. People can read for themselves, I'm just a dude pointing out things that amaze me, and make me think we'll all be rich soon.
I admit I'm a dreamer, but I'm also very logical, no-nonsense and realistic. And open for opposite views, if truthful and non-manipulative.
