Root: Thank you for taking the time to make such a detailed paragraph by paragraph rebuttal.
I guess what I see is the biggest flaw in your logic is you forgive Solms for making all those timelines--which to me seem crystal clear, but you see them as fuzzy or meaning something other than the actual words. You explained it fine, I just disagree.
IMO, the flaw comes when you ignore the fact Solms said things like the Bell-ID will close by August, stand by for announcements, etc. And you jump right into the argument, "What is he supposed to do in this position?" You seem to skip over the fact Solms put himself in that position.
Anyway, let's delay further discussion for a week or two and then we'll have the Q4 results to pore over.
Again, thank you for going to that much trouble with your rebuttal.
Best wishes--Blue