Friday, May 12, 2006 7:38:52 PM
To me it's not critical to learn that CTKH has earned millions, but I'd rather see the fact that they actually earned so many tens or hundreds of thousands then hear where earnings are up 100% or more from last year. I'd like a real number, regardless of how small, though I certainly hope it's large.
What's important is not how much, but the fact that the company's cash positive, that it's growing, and that it will continue to grow for the foreseeable future. I wouldn't even mind if he said we made XX% more this year than last if at the same time he gave a firm figure for what he made last year.
I know round and others have tried to figure what the numbers should be based on figures that were reported years ago. The problem, I believe, is there are some quarters where assumptions must be made. It could be there were losses in those quarters, perhaps losses that were large, it just doesn't work unless you have all the numbers to build on.
Gary
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM