El-
Partly correct, I may purchase stock in the future if I see the changes in the company that I believe necessary for additional personal investment.
I've already provided that specific information for all three and a link for people to verify incarceration if they felt it important for their personal investing decision making process. I do not have access to their personal records to get the other detail you have requested. (But as we both know, you already know the details, so please stop the charade)
Please look at the significance of why I commented on the reverse merger (it wasn't the merger itself, although, I would like to understand the details and reasoning behind agreeing to assume the debt so feel free to share or point me in the right direction on that)
Please review their un-audited financial package as the answer is clearly in there and was also posted multiple times on this Board.
Please re-read my comment on licensee program. I was referring to selling the license to entities that go "sell" the GPSi product. The licensee you are referring to, are people who pay to "use" the software.
Please re-read the details of the reverse split and you'll see that some benefitted as i stated.
Please re-read my comment on public communication as I wrote that they were given, "good advice" from their attorney regarding the sharing of company information that was not being fulfilled (audited financials). It is possible, that for competitive reasons GPSi management changed their strategy and chose to go about their business as quietly as possible.
I never even mentioned or implied that they, "weren't busy" that's another of your mischaracterizations. (please feel free to re-read my answer above as it applies here too)
I cannot comment on whether previous PR had empirical impact either positive or negative on the stock price. I can state that for me personally, communication is important and would keep me more engaged if I can see progress in new accounts and PR's would certainly avoid all of the negative comments on this Board about their silence.
Imagine what a potential investor thinks after reading that GPSi leadership has completely stopped communicating with their public shareholders. In your opinion, Would that translate into a high percentage close ratio in getting that potential investor to buy some shares?
You may want to consider reading my posts with more of an objective mindset- who knows, you might even notice that i also point out and post what is positive.
