The great (Goggle, Apple, Amazon, and MSFT) are about as helpful envisioning and helping to fund, new health mobile appls as a four-sided tire on a race car? And, then there is Black Rock with its new emphasis on socially-conscious new fund to start doing nice things for little companies (and glaringly apparent
weak links in social services and health care provision).
What I see here as a problem(s) for DRIO is:
Lack of cash.
Management 'problems'.
Confusion on part of customer/user on which dawning mobile diabetic reader tech to want. Taking a correct and easy blood glucose reading is somewhat more important than deciding whether Atari, C64, or Texas Instruments T80 would be the customer choice for fun and games platform buy-in?).
Company is WAY too 'cards-to-the-chest' formal, on What and Why DRIO has not yet received FDA Approval.
Me thinks, present diabetic portable devices are fine with many diabetes (as to tech), and maybe they just do not want to go online with their health care info? Not everyone wants the cloud. Think like . . . did you really want to relearn another MSFT software? Specially, DRIO may have miss-guessed the techno-alienation of many older diabetics.
OT: That was a cool airplane-car.
In USA Mueller has designed one that operates more like sit-in quad-copter <---with multiple nacelled moving turbo-engines.
Cheaper and faster and easier to land. He has not got it into production in over 10 years. Do you really want an aircraft-car flown by the Crowd Apes, tossing out their empties before the
air-police force them to land?
