InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 917
Posts 48162
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/22/2008

Re: CBabyTrade post# 3244

Tuesday, 02/10/2015 10:54:17 AM

Tuesday, February 10, 2015 10:54:17 AM

Post# of 27676
Nope, you thought wrong. They're just closing some venues and trying to determine how to consolidate the different overlapping litigation locals...thanks...

I believe the schedule, below, is the latest production:

Defendants’ Position:
Defendants disagree that Plaintiff is entitled to any relief and that, e.g., Plaintiff is owed no
unpaid wages. The issues in this case substantially overlap with the Central District Kronstadt
Case and as noted above, on May 7, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to transfer this case to the
Central District of California. Dkt. 33. The hearing for the motion to transfer will be held on June
6, 2014.
On May 16, 2014, Defendants filed an ex parte motion in the Central District Kronstadt
case to modify the Scheduling Order in order to accommodate the transfer and consolidation with
this case, as well as the transfer and consolidation of the Ben Chang Case. [Central District
Kronstadt Dkt. No. 177]. Plaintiff opposes the ex parte motion.
4. MOTIONS
Currently pending before this Court are three motions: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Transfer
Venue to the Central District (Dkt. 33); (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants’
Counterclaims (Dkt. 35); and Plaintiff’s Application for Writ of Attachment and Right to Attach
Order (Dkt. 30).
The hearing for Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue will be held on June 6, 2014;
Plaintiff shall file its Opposition by May 21, 2014, and Defendants shall file their Reply in support
of their Motion by May 28, 2014.

Excerpted from pdf file "39 - Plain Site"

Link to Google results' page > 39 - Plain Site

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.