InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 1112
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2014

Re: Gamesc post# 63597

Thursday, 01/29/2015 7:21:51 PM

Thursday, January 29, 2015 7:21:51 PM

Post# of 232522
It's not my intention to micro-manage LQMT! Although I'd be willing to discuss some very basic straight forward issues with anyone (the very questions I posed in the post). Here, in private, or anyplace else. Does LQMT deserve to be called out? I think all of us here would agree and say Yes, the whip needs to be cracked. A healthy exchange, but not belittling.


I don't know what Product X is. Or, Product X's are. When I reviewed MTRN website last night it took two seconds for me to determine this was the company that could, maybe, potentially be doing something similar to what I was thinking. Materion's business is right in line with LQMT. MTRN is an authorized seller, perhaps we investors might question why MTRN would bother selling LQMT and not more established, straightforward MTRN products as OoO has mentioned?

I meant what I said about fellow poster Gargol. He and the other "glass is full" colleagues are absolutely with out a doubt more enthusiastic and positive about LQMT than the management has shown. My hat is off to them.

Why has adoption been so slow? Ahh foreshadowing, I think that will be a part of Conspiracy Theory #2!