InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 2221
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/28/2013

Re: coolerheadsprevail post# 21318

Thursday, 01/22/2015 10:54:37 PM

Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:54:37 PM

Post# of 24848

After all, I am sure that you would agree that whether someone is paid to promote a stock or someone participated in a PIPE financing deal, that IF THEY TRULY BELIEVED IN THE LONG-TERM FUTURE OF SCRC AND TRULY INTENDED TO HOLD FOR THE LONG-TERM, then it can actually do wonders for the public’s confidence in the stock if they weren’t trying to hide it.

After all, if someone who is holding 0.00 and/or 0.05 shares of stock is willing to publicly – and proudly, as you have done – disclose that they are the holders of these shares, then this sends a VERY STRONG message to the retail public that the holders of these shares are NOT afraid of anything because they are supremely CONFIDENT in SCRC’s ability to become a powerhouse one day in the near-to-mid-term-future. It proclaims LOUDLY the simple message: “We could have been paid in cash, but we believe in the future of SCRC, so rather than take much needed cash from SCRC as payment for our promotional services as other promoters typically do, we agreed to take stock so that our futures are tied together with SCRC’s future. We may have been paid to promote SCRC but we are NOT simply paid mercenaries – we actually believe in the company we are promoting. We are so confident in SCRC that we are putting our money where our mouth is by disclosing the fact that we are the holders of the 0.00 and 0.05 stock.”

Compare this to the scenario where the holders of the 0.00 and 0.05 shares of stock are refusing to disclose their conflict of interest, especially when the vast majority of the public already knows who most of the recipients are. THIS scenario sends the OPPOSITE message and instead of instilling confidence in the retail public, it instills suspicion and skepticism. It proclaims equally loudly: ”We could have been paid in cash, but we wanted free stock so we can dump and make bank as soon as the shares unlocked. And those .05 PIPE shares? Yeah, cha-ching on those as well.”

I truly believe that the holders of the remaining 0.00 and 0.05 stock have a tremendous opportunity RIGHT NOW to instill that confidence in the retail public marketplace. Those holders who wanted to sell have likely sold the quantities they wanted to dump by now, so I would imagine that whatever shares remain in the float really do have a higher probability of being “locked away in a vault” for a longer period of time. If this is really true, then there is now nothing to lose BUT SO MUCH TO GAIN for the other promoters and financiers whom the SEC filings have disclosed issuances of stock to, to follow Kenbe’s lead and disclose their respective conflicts of interest.


Well, the silence has surely been deafening, LOL... ...I'm sure to no one's surprise, no one else from JOSEPH ZAMPETTI's travelling pennyland circus is willing to abide by SEC laws and disclose their compensated status and financial conflicts of interest... ...not that we needed to hear this silence to know their intent -- the historical tape has long ago bore witness to their true intentions, LOL...