ScripsAmerica Inc. (SCRCQ)

[coolerheadsprevail]

I don't mind telling you that those pipe shares are few and I mean very few that I got

All other things aside, I do want to publicly commend you – sincerely -- for having the courage to publicly disclose that you were one of the recipients of the 22M aggregate shares of toxic .05 PIPE stock. JOSEPH ZAMPETTI, along with other members of his core group would do well to follow your leadership in this regard. Especially w/regards to those who received the 0.00 shares for promoting the stock – as this is actually REQUIRED by law, as opposed to disclosure of PIPE ownership, which is not (but is still an incredible gesture of integrity to do so).

After all, I am sure that you would agree that whether someone is paid to promote a stock or someone participated in a PIPE financing deal, that IF THEY TRULY BELIEVED IN THE LONG-TERM FUTURE OF SCRC AND TRULY INTENDED TO HOLD FOR THE LONG-TERM, then it can actually do wonders for the public’s confidence in the stock if they weren’t trying to hide it.

After all, if someone who is holding 0.00 and/or 0.05 shares of stock is willing to publicly – and proudly, as you have done – disclose that they are the holders of these shares, then this sends a VERY STRONG message to the retail public that the holders of these shares are NOT afraid of anything because they are supremely CONFIDENT in SCRC’s ability to become a powerhouse one day in the near-to-mid-term-future. It proclaims LOUDLY the simple message: “We could have been paid in cash, but we believe in the future of SCRC, so rather than take much needed cash from SCRC as payment for our promotional services as other promoters typically do, we agreed to take stock so that our futures are tied together with SCRC’s future. We may have been paid to promote SCRC but we are NOT simply paid mercenaries – we actually believe in the company we are promoting. We are so confident in SCRC that we are putting our money where our mouth is by disclosing the fact that we are the holders of the 0.00 and 0.05 stock.”

Compare this to the scenario where the holders of the 0.00 and 0.05 shares of stock are refusing to disclose their conflict of interest, especially when the vast majority of the public already knows who most of the recipients are. THIS scenario sends the OPPOSITE message and instead of instilling confidence in the retail public, it instills suspicion and skepticism. It proclaims equally loudly: ”We could have been paid in cash, but we wanted free stock so we can dump and make bank as soon as the shares unlocked. And those .05 PIPE shares? Yeah, cha-ching on those as well.”

I truly believe that the holders of the remaining 0.00 and 0.05 stock have a tremendous opportunity RIGHT NOW to instill that confidence in the retail public marketplace. Those holders who wanted to sell have likely sold the quantities they wanted to dump by now, so I would imagine that whatever shares remain in the float really do have a higher probability of being “locked away in a vault” for a longer period of time. If this is really true, then there is now nothing to lose BUT SO MUCH TO GAIN for the other promoters and financiers whom the SEC filings have disclosed issuances of stock to, to follow Kenbe’s lead and disclose their respective conflicts of interest.

As I’ve stated countless times for well over a year now, once the disclosures are made, I have no issue with any touts as it truly becomes a “caveat emptor” scenario at that point. In fact, once the proper legally required disclosures are made, I may even join them in their touts (within reason, of course, LOL)… …and they know that if I ever decided to tout anything that it would be a quality believable tout…

After all, we all want SCRC to succeed and for ALL shareholders to share in the company’s success, don’t we?

But again, kudos to you, Kenbe. I really mean that. It took cajones to man up and disclose your PIPE ownership the way you did. You have earned my respect and I am pleased to be a fellow shareholder in SCRC with you.