InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 177
Posts 6779
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/26/2012

Re: bkshadow post# 412351

Monday, 01/19/2015 9:23:00 AM

Monday, January 19, 2015 9:23:00 AM

Post# of 730555
... So, "Big Money" is not buying ? ...

So, let's see, you do not believe that the 12/19/2014 initial announcement of a rights offering, by KKR would not' be considered to be "big money" ? ...

And, if someone, took the opposite view, and were to consider KKR's two combined investments to actually be "big money" ... comparitively ... do you and others continue within the theory that KKR spent some 400 million plus dollars, to participate merely within our shell company and our NOL possible valuations?

so, since you don't believe "big money" is here due to any "R" possible returns to the WMI debtors estate, ... I would be interested to hear just why KKR chose to invest some 25% of its liquid cash on hand into WMIH ...

If you are correct, in that all we have are some NOL's to offer, than I would think that KKR needs a special shareholders meeting to be called, NOT WMIH ...

I believe there is much going on that we' as retail shareholders are not aware of and that the future vision is tainted by some ...

I would think that underestimating the financial planning capabilities of the people in charge, would be an error, both past and now present tense'

just sayin

AZ

And "big money" is not buying into any theory that the FDIC-R has found the same tens to hundreds of billions that are asserted to exist in the receivership; the junior bonds are pennies and the senior bonds most impaired. Big money, like the Paulson funds, "bailed on the WMB senior notes

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News