InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 5657
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/28/2009

Re: hedge_fun post# 28437

Sunday, 01/11/2015 6:14:45 PM

Sunday, January 11, 2015 6:14:45 PM

Post# of 31561
As I and others have stated your comments are well constructed and presented. Some of what we post we must remind ourselves is interpreted as conjecture. Some of what I post is conjecture but refined before I post from dialogue I have with agronomist, DOA and others far more informed then myself. In respect to comments of Napier (OR Super Napier) as invasive this has been stated from third party notices but proven lab tests in the case of GKG I believe should mention any invasive trait by HARC or UNANR or anyone evaluating the biomass. I find none. I find GKG as a feedstock to be
viable solution to be a viable replacement for fossil fuels such as gasoline and diesel fuel, and for green biochemicals, bio plastics and biomaterials.

Dr Schewe stated "The major conclusion of the 200+ page feasibility study is that the 925 hectare (2,286 acre), 12 MW power plant and co-located Giant King Grass plantation are both technically and economically feasible. Further details of the feasibility study will be released when it has been formally submitted to and approved by Energia Reino Verde"

Where is the financing? A question ultimately that needs to be answered.
rod