sry it was a link from a login site
I would think they would at least receive a royalty payment.
Michael T. Spink, ISB No. 2201
(mspink@spinkbutler.com)
Chad W. Lamer, ISB No. 9358
(clamer@spinkbutler.com)
SPINK BUTLER, LLP
251 E. Front Street, Suite 200
Boise, ID 83702
P.O. Box 639
Boise, ID 83701
Telephone: 208/388-1000
Facsimile: 208/388-1001
23109.1
Attorneys for FAAC, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
VIRTRA SYSTEMS, INC., a Texas
corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
FAAC, INC., a Michigan corporation,
Defendant.
Case No. 1:14-cv-00319-REB
DEFENDANT’S FOURTH UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Defendant, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully requests an
additional extension of time until February 9, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Counsel
for Defendant has consulted with counsel for Plaintiff regarding this requested extension of time
and Plaintiff’s counsel is unopposed to this requested extension. In support of its Motion,
Defendant states as follows:
DEFENDANT’S FOURTH UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT – 1
Case 1:14-cv-00319-BLW Document 16 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 31. Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this case on August 5, 2014. The Complaint
alleges an infringement of two U.S. patents allegedly held by Plaintiff.
2. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant’s response to the
Complaint was initially due September 24, 2014. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A).
3. Three enlargements of time were requested and granted in this case extending
Defendant’s deadline to file its response to the Complaint to January 8, 2015. No dates have
been set for a pre-trial conference or trial
4. The parties have been diligently working towards settlement and are making
progress. In fact, the parties have reached an agreement in key terms.
5. The relief requested herein is for good cause and will not result in undue delay in
the administration of this case. An enlargement of time for filing Defendant’s response is
necessary due to the ongoing settlement discussions between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Defendant respectfully moves that the Court extend the time
for responding to Plaintiff’s Complaint to February 9, 2015.
DATED this 5th day of January 2015.
SPINK BUTLER, LLP
By: /s/ Chad W. Lamer
Chad W. Lamer
Attorneys for FAAC, Inc.
