Very little credibility ? Thats quite a stretch and quite presumptuous to speak for shareholders in general , there aren't that many who post on these boards to begin with and a certain amount of those who "give no credibility to Solms" have been against Solms from the start which leaves an even smaller amount that are imo just becoming impatient rather than lumping Solms in with that pos who well earned his lack of credibility with wave shareholders and everyone else
I believe waves poor financials are responsible for losing and hopefully only delaying under Solms, some large contracts, this has been referenced in the past as well recently. There appears to be an unwillingness to throw any respectable amount of money waves way by the investment community despite the cyber security issues that the industry is and have been facing for several years now . And i can only conclude that waves poor reputation is the reason this is so , well earned I might add . Poor financial and operational management over so long a time period has left wave with pretty much no one willing to take a chance on them with their money and apparently not very many large businesses want to do business with wave because they have no money and they have no money because fatso left wave with ZERO credibility!!!! Solms is stuck in a catch 22
So Solms took over a company with no credibility in the financial community little or no sensible direction for the company as a whole , poorly equipped sales staff not to mention little or no accountability in the company as a whole not just the sales team , moonlighting employees and on and on and on . I think its pretty amazing that Solms still has wave afloat considering the decrepit state it was in .
The question ought not to be about Solms credibility it ought to be about whether wave was left in too bad a shape to salvage for anyone
