InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[warbil]

M3S, it probably has to do with the revised claim language for the patent that was removed from the ZTE hearing to be heard at a later date.

Also, regarding infringement based on the Qualcomm chip, didn't the CAFC already overturn the ITC judge in the 613 case on an issue regarding the power ramp up patents that in essence voids the ITC's finding of non-infringement in that case? That is why IDCC wants to stay the 868 at the ITC in order to clarify that issue in the 613 remand. I think Nokia was trying to pull a fast one to get the non-infringement finding in the original 613 case applied to the 868 case before the remand decision is released and probably before the issue is addressed in its Delaware case. Thankfully, the ITC saw through it and shut them down. IMO, I think the ITC judge in the 868 believes Nokia will lose its non-infringement finding in the 613 remand at the ITC.