InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,299.65
(
0.33%
)
Post# of 221942
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Renee

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 1512
Posts 35211
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 07/12/2004

Renee

Member Level

Re: TenKay post# 80732

Saturday, 11/29/2014 8:51:13 AM

Saturday, November 29, 2014 8:51:13 AM

Post# of 221942
No, I haven't. I surmise the Court ordered the increases in A/S for NSEH only because Yates likely offered to do so to pay off Hicks.

The Court was probably formalizing the settlement between Hicks and Yates into a Court Order.

Then Yates could argue to the SEC that he was under Court Order to increase the NSEH A/S.

As I see it Yates connives everything to his advantage, even that slow-as-molasses 8-K after the 2 fake news releases helped him and his cronies, plus Hicks, to unload a boatload of shares....and then plead that he and NSEH were victims.

Yates is crooked as a dog's hind leg.

To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up