InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 23
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/05/2014

Re: Brophtron post# 6789

Saturday, 11/22/2014 6:24:06 AM

Saturday, November 22, 2014 6:24:06 AM

Post# of 17026
I agree with you that Starbucks and JAMN don’t play in the same league. I just wanted to point out that neither company showed growth when looked at on a quarterly basis, but both had significant growth when looked at on a yearly basis.

You asked me if I can list any positives for JAMN. Yes, I can, but I can also point out the negatives. This is what I see for JAMN:

Positives:
Strategic Partnership with Mother Parkers
The “Marley” name is a strong global brand
Excellent annual growth rate
Eco Cup technology
Strategic Partnership with “Sparkling Drink System” and “Bevyz”
Potential to open coffee shops with Jammin Java branding


Negatives:
They are out of cash again - need a cash infusion
Customer acquisition cost is too high - need a more cost effective way to grow sales
Gross Profit margin needs to be higher
Dilution or debt depending on how they raise capital
Eco Cup is not compatible with Keurig 2.0


I’m sure I can think of many more pro’s and con’s, but that’s it for now. Every stock has risk and JAMN is no exception. The next quarterly report will need to show $2.5 million or higher to have a shot at making their $10 million target.