InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 3840
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2008

Re: tdtcal post# 29425

Sunday, 11/16/2014 11:25:57 PM

Sunday, November 16, 2014 11:25:57 PM

Post# of 85927
Continuous co-current electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide

1. I found the reference you gave and wondered why the link nor title of the PATENT APPLICATION by MVTG & Professor Oloman was not clearly labeled. Hmmm... Obviously Professor Oloman has not moved on elsewhere to some other company.

2. The original patents for ERC were referenced in the Patent Application. There is no statement of invalidation nor problems with the original patent application(s) of ERC in this document that I could find. Nor could I find that this Patent Application was claimed to be superior to any previous related patents for superceding purposes. Section [0012] on adobe page 12 of 20 on this same topic said "may be....". I am glad MVT is careful.

3. This one appears to be a protective adjunct patent. That is, one that covers other closely related processes, mechanics, etc. I will let MVTG address this in their own time for those who need to know for personal reasons. No issue for me.

Given the complexity of this document and the many documents available on MVTG R&D, programs, etc. how did you just happen to find this exact little quote?

Inquiring minds want to know.