When long-standing investor shareholders have already been diluted to nothing, and officers are paying themselves $426,000 PER QUARTER, and this has been going on agonizingly, for two or more years, it is inadvisable to suggest -- much less seriously entertain consideration of -- a reverse split. Enough of people's money being taken and taken. Time for the officers to suspend their salaries pending paying off any debts legitimately owed, and to consider paying those debts from their "personal" funds, which funds, after-all, derived from shareholders pockets under the assumption the company was meeting its obligations to its business partners. Talk of a reverse split raises the issue of whether court mandated mental health status exams are in order. A reverse split in this particular case suggests someone is out-of-touch with Reality. Talk of a Reverse Split represents an unacceptable, pre-meditated "threat to oneself or others", warranting a psychological assessment of whoever suggested it. It is grossly inappropriate to this company's history and circumstances. The officers would clearly do well to rid themselves of whoever has been advising them on matters of finance and fund raising, and pay their debts by some means other than further taking and taking from pre-existing shareholders.
