InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 426
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/12/2013

Re: whackywinston post# 13901

Thursday, 11/13/2014 10:29:52 AM

Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:29:52 AM

Post# of 57057
So true, Whacky. I've been a party to many NDAs between Fortune 100 companies involving high technology applications/products. Mostly, these are mutually restrictive agreements intended to protect both parties from outsiders attempting to preempt or take advantage of an imminent agreement between the NDA parties who wish to do business with each other. The NDA is needed to protect each company as they negotiate the terms of the agreement. Without an NDA, both parties could be raked over the coals by their competitors' blogging minions who wish either or both companies ill will. We see this today with the so-called gang of 5 or 6 posters who constantly rip both STWA and "less so" TC for their interest in this NEW TECHNOLOGY.

It's just business. I totally agree with the person who just posted that the more this gang of 5 or 6 opines negatively about this potential deal with little to no factual backup to their arguments, the more I'm averaging down my holdings.

There will be a BIG PAY DAY very soon, I assure you.

Cheers to ALL ZERO LONGS!!!