There is little one can conclude from the tight buys and sells that have occurred here over the past months. Behind the scenes detail and purpose is not visible to us non-MM's. That shorts exist and have been more active lately as we get closer to planned announcements is an obvious fact from OTC reports. Therefore, a non-issue.
As proprietary information developed in past labs, research, collaboration with Kemira, Lafarge, Alstom, our contractors, contract researchers and Governments through grant applications, etc., I would never expect MVTG to make public every detail of their progress and mechanics. Substantive delays to operational benchmarks due to known serious challenges are required disclosures (in general terms) for 10-Q's, etc. I find none to date so far. Has anyone else so found?
By the rules of logic and philosophy, absence of an answer to a question posed by a person neither creates a problem nor proves a
point. Only substantive information or valid in full context facts can be acceptable in determining the correctness.
Like so many questions asked and subsequently answered favorably here in the past, we non-experts do not have the full understanding of the context of statements made by others, such as on poisoning of the anode. HQ knows I am sure. As a non-expert, if I give an response to this question, who would accept it without full authoritative references? The answer will come in its own time like all the others. Certainly MVTG's clients and collaborators want operational efficiency and durability more than anyone else... and thus would have addressed such known issues long ago. To say otherwise is like saying we know more than they do will all their professional staff.
