InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 126
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2013

Re: KCCO7913 post# 13864

Wednesday, 10/29/2014 6:32:10 PM

Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:32:10 PM

Post# of 192751
legit post kcco. yes this company needs to prove itself. not another update pushing the timeline forward into the future. if they have anything, someone should bite OR we should be able to see some type of third party white paper that confirms that the goo actually works. i dont want to hear about tom being frustrated or that the u of c boys arent getting the job done. i don't want to hear that the lab isn't quite done and THAT this is the NEW key to success. been there, done that. enough is enough.

someone asked about the sbir status. this isn't the same one as our original submission but pretty close. http://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/689835 are we part of this or have they moved in a different direction? pretty nice award.

Q's
what is the status of the 3rd party partner? (origanlly mentioned in dec 2013)
where are the results of the all optical switch?
if we are that close to commercialization (yes i know, 2 years down the road) why do we need to acquire a company for revenue?
why did tom say no plans to hire new employees after the capital raise was done?
why does a material sciences company/device company still operate without a cto?
why if the M/A was so important has the company no called for an emergency SH meeting to get this done?

Alot of questions here. No need to give the 'BS' posts that I am a glass half full type of guy. These are real questions that deserve to be answered. Alot of us have been suffering here for along time.
Waiting paitently but loosing patience.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LWLG News