InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,109.43
(
-0.13%
)
US TECH 100
17,263.50
(
-0.27%
)
Dow Jones
38,197.40
(
-0.49%
)
Brent Oil
86.00
(
-1.48%
)
Bitcoin
60,892.37
(
-4.62%
)
Post# of 36237
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Rich

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 325
Posts 33014
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 04/28/2009

Rich

Re: Snizzle post# 26611

Saturday, 10/18/2014 7:41:30 PM

Saturday, October 18, 2014 7:41:30 PM

Post# of 36237
Funny you can tell me my statement is 100% inaccurate with nothing to back it up. You said there were other toxic lenders, who are they?

If you read the Q it clearly states that the BOD has been loaning the company money since 2010, you would also learn that there are notes owed to a consulting firm owned by one of the BODs, you may also learn there are notes that were aquired during the merger.

C'mon Snizz, show me who these toxic lenders are.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up