Imagine if the debt was still over $6M and Tarpon was owed that, that would be destructive. The amount of debt left ot pay is a lot less than it was originally. STLK didn't ask Tarpon to take over the debt. They were sued by Tarpon, remember? STLK didn't solicit Tarpon. As I said before, there are no 'investors' just traders interested in the next big scam. Nobody invests on fundamentals in the OTC, it's a crap tier filled with frontloading scam traders selling shares from one fool to a bigger fool.
You can't say STLK isn't generating any revenue because you don't know. Unless of course, you have the next Q. Asher is out, did you not see the sticky? Oh wait, you're gonna tell me about the little known secret again. Pfft.
Suggesting STLK will RS is weak. Suggesting that STLK won't generate any revenue in the near future is also weak.
I suppose anyone could destroy the logic of what I have posted by taking things out of context or relying on semantics. But that only proves the desperation of a lack of facts or sound reasoning to dispute the logic.
Your logic is clearly an opinion. Too much speculation in your 'logic.
Don't trade or flip STLK until the debt is gone? LMAO!! Remember that tip when trading folks, don't trade stocks with debt. That eliminates about 99% of the stocks out there.
