InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 132
Posts 30425
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/10/2006

Re: imiloa post# 5083

Monday, 04/17/2006 3:18:00 PM

Monday, April 17, 2006 3:18:00 PM

Post# of 56764
janice, re: LFWK Form3

Good point on the lack of "proof." But after all their hoopla, wouldn't they be setting themselves up for an intense disembowelling by the SEC if they are lying about this? ie: If it were just a PR stunt to gain eyeballs on their company?

If they were an unproven paper company (eg: PAIM, KSWJ), it would make sense. But LFWK has an ongoing brick&mortar (literally) biz. They'd be risking it all by lying.

Agreed that this is not proof. But, in my experience, everything in the markets is a game of probabilities.

99.99% of all pinks are scams. Best to assume the other 0.01% are as well.