InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 68
Posts 5584
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/13/2012

Re: JustGarden post# 43154

Wednesday, 10/08/2014 9:32:50 AM

Wednesday, October 08, 2014 9:32:50 AM

Post# of 330715
Thanks for the question Garden - In my view, FDA is fully able to handle the legitimate, fully researched, scientific criticisms aa well as the hot air, shoot from the lip attacks, which are always present. When one reads the latter, they often come up as nothing more than light rhetoric required for a publication deadline of the sort where the author/critic/attacker also has a case of ActiPatch at home for the pain suffered by his or her ailing parent. The question to ask is if the comment or article contains any credible information or just la la. For example, I can call myself "National Centers of Health Research and write whatever I like by adding an 's'. Instant and impressive sounding credability!

I know for a fact that those I know of who have used ActiPatch, including me, are both amazed by it and then swear by it. One only has to look at the UK activities - the surge in publications writing of BIEL products and how many people over there are asking friends and relatives, daily, "Have you heard about ActiPatch?". It's being 'Branded' in the UK and we are playing catch-up.