InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 37
Posts 1269
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/14/2009

Re: leifsmith post# 144886

Tuesday, 10/07/2014 7:53:56 AM

Tuesday, October 07, 2014 7:53:56 AM

Post# of 173217
This seems to be a pretty remarkable statement. As VP rightly points out- it's about as far as one can go without putting out an NR. And exactly what "pending offers" means isn't completely clear. But where there is smoke there is fire. First- from long contact with JB, I am confident that 1papermaker is correct when he says "JB is not lying". Second- the term "interest" and "interested parties" has been used in the past. Unfortunately- as we have all witnessed- "interested parties" do not necessarily become partners. That term might have been used here. But instead- "pending offers" was used to describe the current situation. I believe this choice of words is significant and very promising. Clearly this is something else- and indicates that this is more than just "interested parties". Obviously a deal has not been concluded as yet. If it were- it would, of course, be a very material event and be proudly announced in an NR. So I believe this is about as close as we can get without an NR and is an indication that we really are moving closer to a deal. At least, that is my belief.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LBSR News