InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4309
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/16/2013

Re: alkalinesolution1 post# 11694

Friday, 09/12/2014 4:37:58 PM

Friday, September 12, 2014 4:37:58 PM

Post# of 57237
Interesting. Yes, you could be right, considering that same 56% viscosity reduction number probably also came from the RMOTC tests. However, TransCanada is clearly monitoring their website to make sure they don't say anything that they don't want them to. We known this because TransCanada made them take down that corporate profile showing the Keystone Pipeline. In that light, the viscosity reduction number is one thing because it's been published, but making a claim like 10% to 15% increase in daily volume is different. Maybe they just are estimating it based on the 56% number, but I don't think so. They have never talked about that number anywhere before, and they published that number on their website at just about the exact same time the test ended, July 15th. That's too much of a coincidence to me. Either way it's just a guess anyway. Remember too, that they are telling investors to read the SEC documents and the website closely, which also tells me they are leaving clues.
They are telling investors as much as they can, without breaking the nda.