InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: ladavis23 post# 34073

Thursday, 09/11/2014 3:09:42 PM

Thursday, September 11, 2014 3:09:42 PM

Post# of 426708
L-

I agree „delay” does not mean anything (either bad or good). I worried a little bit till yesterday as they already received a “no” and not communicate just on the quarterly call as the last two times (no and delay), but JZ made it clear that they will communicate the no also.

My view is different about MPC involvement, it is a positive sign since JJ easily could say “no” alone, he does not need a support for this. I think he has – at least – some doubt regarding the two lower levels actions. I think he involved MPC:
a.) could not decide alone …
b.) it will be a reinstatement, but with this step they could “defend” their previous action (DMEP & ODE II) – it was complex, new info, etc. and he will have some explanation to DMEP & ODE II also …
We will see… however if it will be no, the SPA lawsuit is still away (at least 6 months) since they have to go through JW & MH.

Agree, all these events will have no affect.

I do not have any idea regarding the duration of 1st amendment judgment. Furthermore, I have additional question: which is first? Judgment or using ANCHOR data usage? Will they request a preapproval or will pretend their action?

It’s amazing that some folks expected a Q&A session yesterday. They thought it is a Conference Call …

Before I forget, I think we could agree that ... Öööö ... John ö Thero is not the Öööö... best öööö.. presenter in the ... Öööö world....
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News